Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plug and Play Tech Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. RL0919 (talk) 14:24, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Plug and Play Tech Center[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear lack of attention, WP:GNG fails. ALSTROEMERIA🌸Čijukas Kuvajamas 02:04, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Products, and California. ALSTROEMERIA🌸Čijukas Kuvajamas 02:04, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. @Fumikas Sagisavas: did not supply a reason why the article should be deleted. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:29, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. A quick Bing News search brings up results such as them opening a new office in Vancouver, a partnership with JetBlue, other things from sources such as MarketWatch. That being said, most of those are press releases. A lack of attention does not equate to not meeting notability requirements, and it does not seem like the nominator has done a thorough BEFORE search. If anything, the nomination relies on WP:LASTING. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 05:57, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Looks notable to me. UtherSRG (talk) 15:16, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete coverage is all press releases and other stuff we can't use to prove notability. Kudos for this crypto spam [1], even has a fancy Eiffel Tower graphic and a quote from twitter! This just isn't notable. Oaktree b (talk) 02:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per X750 Alexcs114 (talk) 08:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:SIGCOV, sources are unreliable as well. --TheInsatiableOne (talk) 09:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. Plug and Play Tech Center has a global impact as an innovation platform, connecting startups (engaged over 35,000 startups, including tech giants like Google and PayPal). However, better sources should be added as well. --BoraVoro (talk) 11:18, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:39, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NCORP, there doesn't appear to be much in the way of coverage which clearly demonstrates notability. Article badly needs a non-promotional rewrite if kept. SportingFlyer T·C 15:43, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Going through the 13 pages of ghits, none of them even plausibly meet CORPDEPTH. Bing and yahoo results are much the same. Neither WP:CCSI nor routine coverage are considered suitable for establishing corporate notability. Alpha3031 (t • c) 03:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NCORP. The person who loves reading (talk) 02:21, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.