Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plivo (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:02, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Plivo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article on this company was soft-deleted after AfD in January. After requests by WP:SPAs Plivoinc and Abhijit0602, that version was restored to Draft:Plivo in May, but remains there with no further activity. This newly-created article is substantially different from that previous instance, apart from a couple of similar sentences and shared references. Since the previous article went through AfD, a new discussion is appropriate. The article text and references relate mainly to start-up funding and incubator participation, plus a description of their main product features and a brief new product announcement. These still seem insufficient for WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 18:41, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 18:46, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 18:46, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 18:46, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:19, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Seems to be considered a major player in its niche area, but unless anyone can find something that I couldn't, coverage doesn't seem sufficient to justify an article. --Michig (talk) 18:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.