Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Play-Asia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. The nomination for deletion was withdrawn, and no delete !votes are present. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:15, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Play-Asia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No new sources since tagged with {{Notability}} in December 2007. The three added appears to be trivial mention of Sony shipments stopping and an article about a game they helped fund. Bjelleklang - talk 21:55, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawing nomination after clarification and comments from other users :) Bjelleklang - talk 18:15, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:41, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:41, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:41, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk). — Frankie (talk) 17:42, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - a WP:VG established reliable sources search shows a plethora of mentions in major media outlets. They're only mentions, however, so take that as you will. --Teancum (talk) 19:08, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - To my understanding, Play-Asia is a rather major seller of video games. I think it would be comparable to suggesting that GameStop or Game (retailer) isn't notable, which would be rather ludicrous. Also, the fact that a retailer funded a game, or got into legal issues with other companies, seems rather noteworthy, considering it's not especially common, and reliable sources reported on it. Don't get me wrong, the article surely needs a ton of fixing up, it's in terrible shape, but AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Sergecross73 msg me 19:20, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I'm of mixed minds. This is arguably a very well-known company, but the article's lacking for good cause: I sifted through the WP:VG/RS and I'm not finding more than mentions (in English, at least). It was compared to other retailers briefly in several results, but I wouldn't normally count that as passing GNG. Can anyone find sales figures or articles about their business, especially in LOTE? czar · · 20:38, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Seems to be plenty of RSes online. Kotaku mentions them quite a bit and I saw an article on Ars Technica as well. There are several other RSes too. The article needs improvement, not deletion. -Thibbs (talk) 21:06, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I live under a rock, and I've actually heard of this. Dengero (talk) 11:05, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.