Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Platinumb Heart Open

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Despite a month long afd, no views were expressed contrary to keeping the article. A merger with Platinumb Heart Beating has already since been done and a rename to Platinumb Heart can be done outside of the afd. (non-admin closure) Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:51, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Platinumb Heart Open[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that this meets WP:NALBUM Gbawden (talk) 06:11, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Gbawden (talk) 06:11, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and rename to Platinumb Heart: This is a double album. The sources in the article, except for Apple Music, seem reliable. I also found a few more reliable sources which talk about the album: [1], [2] and [3]. That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 15:45, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:53, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm not sure if this is a double album or two separate albums released on the same day, like Use Your Illusion I and II, so I don't know if I would recommend the renaming of both albums. The first article Superastig listed above is no use: the album gets a one-line mention in passing in an article about an entirely different subject. I don't know if the other two sources are reliable ones or not, but they are certainly proper coverage. Richard3120 (talk) 02:02, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Richard3120, it's kinda confusing. The sources I found mentioned either "double album" or "2 albums released". But, I never found a single source which talks about either of the albums alone aside from download links. Since they're both released on the same day, I believe merging them into 1 article would be a better option. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 14:23, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Superastig: I agree. They certainly have two separate artworks for the digital versions. But I can't find out if they were released in physical form, which would tell us if they were sold in the same physical package or two separate packages with two cover pictures. Richard3120 (talk) 14:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and merge with Platinumb Heart Beating. I agree with a merger of two since it's not clear on how they were released. But it does meet WP:NALBUM with sources pointed out and presented by Astig. They're reliable enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 00:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bold third relist for further input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:24, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.