Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:04, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plash[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:BURDEN, sources aren't in the article. If they get added you can invite me to return to this opinion. Miami33139 (talk) 23:28, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:52, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 22:35, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Also a possible copyvio - the entire article has been cut and pasted from its website. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:29, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No evidence of notability at all. NBeale (talk) 23:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.