Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Places in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that content is purely in-universe without showing notability, as well as being an unneeded content fork from the individual/series articles. Nosebagbear (talk) 15:07, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Places in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable collection of in-universe WP:PLOT only details. The details about one planet being in the top ten of naming a celestial body are completely trivial. There is a main series article and five novel articles, so there should be no issue describing the necessary context of the relevant locations in each individual page. TTN (talk) 13:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 13:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 13:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Before looking at the state of the article I was thinking that maybe one or two of these had potential, but not after looking at it. I don't see anything that can be rescued to the series pages' that isn't already covered there in the narrative. --Masem (t) 14:07, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and multiple WP:INUNIVERSE violations. Bondegezou (talk) 18:57, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom and per WP:TNT._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:30, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: No one will take up the challenge to repair this should it be deleted. The legacy of this deletion will be a swarm of redlinks. Serendi ^podous 11:55, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It would need a full rewrite regardless to comply with Wikipedia standards. But surely fine details about the planets of a fictional work are not super necessary to understand that work._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:46, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.