Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pixie Davies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn, was trending "Keep" anyway. Joyous! | Talk 02:49, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pixie Davies[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. Seems to have only played a handful of minor roles in a few movies/shows. IagoQnsi (talk) 22:00, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For reference, here's her IMDb. I only see one role that could potentially be called significant (Humans). -IagoQnsi (talk) 22:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No references at all in the article, which we cannot tolerate. IMDb is not considered a reliable source, and as a listing of everything and everyone can not be used towards establishing notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:08, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Contrary to what the nom says, the individual seems to qualify quite handsomely on NACTOR. She acted as Sophie Hawkins in Humans and as Bronwyn in the Miss Peregrine's...movie. Here's a book discussing the subject and her work in the movie in-depth. Here are two more sources confirming her role as Sophie Hawkins.[1][2]. Clarification: NACTOR does not require sources to be in-depth. NACTOR requires sources to confirm that the subject has played the said multiple significant roles, which these sources confirm. I'll suggest that editors improve this article. Deleting this might not be the procedure appropriate here. Lourdes 02:21, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 18:40, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Appears to pass WP:NACTOR. Contrary to the nom's premise, has had multiple starring roles (not minor) in multiple notable television shows like Humans and 'The Secret of Crickley Hall.--Oakshade (talk) 17:28, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As clarified by me above. Lourdes 00:09, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Looking over everything again, this AfD was a mistake -- article should be kept. Sorry about that. IagoQnsi (talk) 01:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnpacklambert: Do you agree about a speedy keep? —C.Fred (talk) 02:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.