Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pixar Pier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Paradise Pier. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:35, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pixar Pier[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable content fork of Paradise Pier. James (^talk/_contribs) 19:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:12, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator had tried to merge but it was undone by the article creator. Redirect per nom, until such time as a page move is required to the new name. I believe that's what we have done in cases where amusement parks have been rebranded and rethemed, but if that's not so, please ping me. I see that the nominator is a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Disney so I rather think he's on solid ground, here. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:16, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've also added Category:Proposed amusement parks, which I think pertains, for now. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:18, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That category has been removed by an IP account, with explanation. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:36, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:18, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As the Disney WP seems to be semi-active, I've linked to this Afd from WikiProject Amusement Parks. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:57, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect for now – Paradise Pier should eventually be renamed "Pixar Pier" once the new theme is applied in 2018. I don't see a reason to have two separate articles. --GoneIn60 (talk) 09:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
'Redirect for now, agree with Shawn in Montreal's judgement, as someone who is a member of both WikiProjects affected. Elisfkc (talk) 03:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.