Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pivot (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Vote count is 2d-1k but Kappa has provided a reasonable reason to keep, and good points have also been presented in the comments. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:49, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pivot (band)[edit]

No evidence of notability. --W(t) 23:11, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

if closed as delete, please remember to also remove the link at the pivot dab page --W(t)

Weak delete. Note that most of their releases seem to be singles or EPs, or minor labels. Stifle 00:17, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes WP:MUSIC: "Featured review and CD compilation in Jan 2005 German Magazine "Rock Hard" Over 90,000 Issues sold per month" Kappa 18:44, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, leaning keep - "These guys have some real potential." - and when they seriously use it and move out of the local scene we will have a much better case for WP:MUSIC. Dan, the CowMan 05:51, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - It appears to me that this band has already moved beyond their local scene. In reviewing their accomplishments, they already have national and international exposure and notability. In reviewing the WP:MUSIC guidelines, the German magazine alone qualifies them, not to mention their exposure on the USA network and several other items in the list.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.