Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pirates of the caribbean the fountain of youth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 09:20, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pirates of the caribbean the fountain of youth[edit]
- Pirates of the caribbean the fountain of youth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- Delete - as article fails WP:CRYSTAL. Sting_au Talk 11:20, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Done some research, and information about the potential film seems to be all rumour based and not confirmed. Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:OR until it is confirmed that there will be such a film and more information is clear. Camaron1 | Chris (talk) 13:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as crystal-balling. Let me draw attention to this sentence: "With many rumours going around it is difficult to know what is true and what is false." So let's wait until the movie is released, so we do know what is true or false? 1ForTheMoney (talk) 13:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per WP:CRYSTAL.--Cube lurker (talk) 13:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to the Pirates of the caribbean page. People might start searching for info on the movie and it seems appropriate to redirect them to the main article where any official information will be quickly updated. GtstrickyTalk or C 14:00, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as per above, and as unsourced WP:OR, the sources are not acceptable. Cirt (talk) 17:55, 20 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Strong Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:OR Doc Strange (talk) 18:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 19:27, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete as blatant crystal balling and original research. --JForget 01:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.