Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pirate Party Nepal
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was already speedily deleted by R'n'B per G7 (author requested deletion). Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:58, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Pirate Party Nepal[edit]
- Pirate Party Nepal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable, and furthermore likely non-existant IRL. Google search gives nothing except wikipedia and facebook. Article claims a membership of 11, facebook page has 9 members. The name in Nepali is quite suspicious to me "Samudri Daka" literally means "Sea Pirate"/"Sea Robber", not "Pirate" in general. Soman (talk) 23:17, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Non-notable yet, but existent. Facebook page fans != party members. The website will be released once membership with PPI is finalized. I do not know of a better translation to "pirate" in Nepali; do you know of one? Hold delete for 7 days. Prameya —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.111.24.211 (talk) 04:33, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- So you're admitting it's non-notable? Delete then. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:13, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ouf of curiosity, was this AfD nomination done correctly? There aren't any categories. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:50, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Well yea, non-notable because no one knows about it! Should change soon. We expect to hear back from PPI next week. I am not aware about the categories; please help fix. Also, I probably deleted that by accident. If deleting this article makes wikipedia better. Go for it. I created it thinking people would be interested to know. Maybe it was too early. Prameya —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.111.24.211 (talk) 19:44, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Subjects have to be notable before they get a Wikipedia article, not after. Erpert (let's talk about it) 22:12, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have just sent request to the .np TLD domain registry regarding registration of pirateparty.org.np. We have been waiting for that domain to set our web presence there. I have also been in contact with Gregory Engels of Pirate Parties International regarding affiliation with them. The problem with being a small initiative, specially in a developing country like Nepal is getting relevant press coverage to establish prominence. I am in contact with a few notable media houses in Nepal, and they are positive. I will post links to them as soon as I get them. In the mean time, if necessary, would it be possible to set this article as a draft rather than deletion? That way, I can keep working on this article while not loosing the work already put into it. Let me know. Also, thanks for your help with this. I really appropriate your help and your patience :) Prameya —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.230.137.83 (talk) 20:10, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd suggest you save the current article data in a word document. Once there is coverage by different prominent newsmedia, re-upload with those references. --Soman (talk) 20:42, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have created a copy of this article here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Prameya/Pirate_Party_of_Nepal. Ok for deletion for now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prameya (talk • contribs) 13:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- In that case, I tagged it for speedy per G7. Erpert (let's talk about it) 15:54, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.