Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pioneer Records

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:46, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pioneer Records[edit]

Pioneer Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Article has been mostly untouched since 2010.  — TORTOISEWRATH 09:23, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:39, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:39, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:39, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - only issued a single notable record in 1987. WP:NOTINHERITED. Bearian (talk) 21:07, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: certainly fails WP:NCORP, and in any case I'm not convinced this article isn't a hoax. There is no sign of this Pioneer Records having released a Dizzy Gillespie album – the 1987 concert was broadcast by the BBC but doesn't seem to have been released on CD until 2000, by BBC Music. The 1989 concert at the Festival Hall was originally released by the Enja label. The other band and their EP mentioned in the article don't appear to exist. The creator's only other edit to Wikipedia was to insert a joke edit about Chuck Norris in another article. There have since been a couple of other Pioneer Record labels started up to release dance music, but they have nothing to do with this supposed label. Richard3120 (talk) 21:25, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.