Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pioneer Drama Service

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:36, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pioneer Drama Service[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP which says "A single independent source is almost never sufficient for demonstrating the notability of an organization". I was not able to find any additional sources to establish notability. shoy (reactions) 15:49, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 15:52, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 15:52, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 15:52, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. HighBeam yields a substantial source: "Child's plays: All the world really is a stage for local publisher's works." Rocky Mountain News, May 9, 2006. Not enough by itself, especially for those with aversions to interviews as part of an article's sourcing, but suggestive of the potential significance of this publisher as one of the best-known in its specialized area. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:30, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No evidence this meets the relevant guidelines, and little out there beyond namedrops and press releases. Ravenswing 18:21, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Just wanted to mention that at the English Wiktionary a number of plays published by the Pioneer Drama Service are quoted, and this article is linked to in the references: see [1]. — SGconlaw (talk) 13:23, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 04:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 17:48, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The one reference is marginal. True, it's fully about this company, but in a local publication of unknown editorial quality. Be that as it may, WP:NCORP requires multiple sources, so this fails NCORP by a wide margin. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:58, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.