Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pink Peacock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 14:44, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pink Peacock[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As proposed by @Neil_McDermott, many of the verifiable, reliable sources are press reports on what appear to be largely caper-based/publicity stunt type events. The café has now closed permanently. It's only notability seems to have been the minor controversy surrounding some of the staff members actions Qcne (talk) 13:45, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Qcne (talk) 13:45, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

KeepThe Reader's Digest source used in the article seems ok, it has enough coverage for GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 13:54, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Sexuality and gender, Judaism, and Scotland. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, unless someone can show a WP:NCORP fail that isn't based on a No true Scotsman of what counts as a notable event. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 04:56, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Multiple reliable sources establish notability. --DH22 Mim (talk) 12:40, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep article could be improved but sources such as Readers Digest, Glasgow Live and STV show sustained coverage in reliable secondary sources. The fact that the cafe is now closed does not affect its notability. Mujinga (talk) 14:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly has significant coverage in reliable sources. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sufficiently sourced to keep. gidonb (talk) 15:51, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There are enough reliable sources demonstrating this cafe's notability. Furthermore, notability is not temporary; a subject does not lose its notability just because it's closed. Epicgenius (talk) 03:49, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.