Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PingGadget

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 11:36, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PingGadget[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see sufficient notability for this web services and it doesn't have third-party references that convince me it's notable. Shadowjams (talk) 21:56, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Favonian (talk) 23:35, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Can find no reliable sources. Christopher Connor (talk) 19:30, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 01:12, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I found several reliable sources on the company. The notability of the web service is also sufficient. Socialmaven 09:34, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn't appear to pass notability requirements. As it is, only a single reference on the article actually refers to the subject and it's only an interview on technorati. Just not been around long enough to generate secondary coverage yet. Shell ^babelfish 19:24, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.