Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinchas Winston

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 20:32, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pinchas Winston[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fringe author (as is particularly obvious from an older version) of self-published, unreviewed books. No evidence of passing WP:AUTHOR or any other applicable notability guideline. I would have gone the PROD route, but one was added and removed over a decade ago, making the page technically ineligible (not that it's been improved in the interval). XOR'easter (talk) 20:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 20:14, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 20:26, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 20:26, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per my concerns previously addressed on its talk page, I don't see independent reviews of his books and for various I can't even find items corresponding to the ISBN. This indicates failure to meet WP:BLPN. I found this more mainstream source: https://atlantajewishtimes.timesofisrael.com/rabbi-winston-shares-message-of-redemption/ but yes, that's what apocalyptic preachers do. For the original state of the article I would more say it was a religious sermon than only fringe (yet obviously not acceptable as-is in an encyclopedia article). —Paleo Neonate – 20:32, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the lack of independent reviews seems to suggest Winston is not a notable writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:45, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.