Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pilu Khan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:19, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pilu Khan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reasons: 1. References are weak 2. No mentionable award. 3. No significant contribution. Md Joni Hossain (talk) 19:10, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Md Joni Hossain (talk) 19:10, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Bangladesh. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 19:12, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, mainly routine coverage or interviews; doesn't fulfill WP:GNG. ayakanaa ( t · c ) 19:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as has dedicated reliable sources coverage such as here and interviews in national newspapers referenced in the article such as here , passes WP:GNG in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To review sources proposed by Atlantic306 vs GNG.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect, to Renaissance as an WP:ATD. The Dhaka Courier article is significant coverage, but the interview based articles do not support notability. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 22:03, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As @Ayakanaa explains, it fails WP:ROUTINE and WP:SUSTAINED, it doesn't fall in line with WP:GNG due to such. Noorullah (talk) 05:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is no consensus here yet but leaning toward Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:47, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No WP:SIGCOV. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As a member of Souls and Renaissance, meets criterion #5 of WP:MUSICBIO. Renaissance is not a suitable redirect target because of his participation in a second independently notable ensemble. Atlantic306 and SailingInABathTub have singled out the Dhaka Courier article. There is also Bengali-language significant coverage, such as [1]. --Worldbruce (talk) 20:09, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.