Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pilot & Huxley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 19:02, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pilot & Huxley[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N, no significant coverage Revolution1221 (talk) 22:33, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Although the article doesn't show this yet, Pilot & Huxley has been reviewed by Wired, The New York Review of Books, and Kirkus. I will add these refs to the article, but to my mind, that counts as significant coverage. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 03:51, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have since added these and another ref. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 21:41, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 10:05, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Received reviews from three reliable review sources. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 14:04, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.