Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piet Boukema
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:36, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Piet Boukema[edit]
- Piet Boukema (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no information what so ever Redsky89 (talk) 15:45, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- perhaps keep There is a substantial Dutch article which indicates that he was a member of the Dutch senate. I don't know if that is enough to get him over the notability hump. Mangoe (talk) 16:51, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. For some reason, it seems difficult to find sources, but there is enough to verify that he definitely meets WP:POLITICIAN (and I have edited the article accordingly). PWilkinson (talk) 11:40, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Thanks to PWilkinson for the expansion and reference which makes it clear that the subject meets WP:POLITICIAN point #1 having served both at the provincial and national levels of government. -- Whpq (talk) 16:37, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.