Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre Amiel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (A quick gsearch shows the author is not the same Pierre Amiel as the painter.) Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:55, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre Amiel[edit]

Non notable, only reference is a personal website. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 13:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. — Ism schism (talk) 13:53, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I think possibly even speedy with a7. Ray Yang (talk) 21:27, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The person may be notable as a painter, even if he is not as an author. I can't tell whether the author is the same as the painter Pierre Amiel, but the URL given in the writer's article, http://www.pierreamiel.com/ , is one used by the painter . Note the review in Le Figaro reproduced here. --Eastmain (talk) 03:36, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment After over 5 days of discussion, personal websites aside, this article is still about a non-notable. As is, this article should be deleted. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 03:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.