Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Picket-fencing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Going with the delete rationale. If anyone wants to do a redirect, feel free to WP:BEBOLD and propose it or do it via the appropriate pages. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 18:00, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Picket-fencing[edit]

Picket-fencing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As per WP:NOTSLANG, this should be deleted. Furthermore, I am unfamiliar with this term and a search only brings up results relating to actual fences (as one would expect). Rusf10 (talk) 20:29, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 20:29, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 20:29, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nom. The fact that the article does not cite any sources may relate to the fact that the article is based on an unconventional term, or even just a lesser-known one (I feel like the GNG ties into this). Lankyliver🧠 (talk / contribs) 23:16, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's actually a well-known one. It's in the Ham Radio For Dummies book. Uncle G (talk) 01:18, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is just flutter (electronics and communication), and the name is a widely used one. Uncle G (talk) 01:18, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So: redirect? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 01:56, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - dictionary definition. Not every bit of technical jargon warrants an article. --Wtshymanski (talk) 21:46, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.