Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Physicians and Surgeons for Scientific Integrity (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Discovery Institute. Merge must be done selectively. (non-admin closure) Szzuk (talk) 21:26, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Physicians and Surgeons for Scientific Integrity[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct organisation. In checking the sources there is nothing to show sufficient notability - they sponsored a couple of events, but didn't get much in the way of coverage. Bilby (talk) 13:11, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:43, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:06, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Organisation doesn't appear to have any news coverage since 2006, and then only one from a blog post. There seems to have been some minor coverage by sympathetic sources, many of them blogs, dating from around this time but the organisation seems to be gone. Mramoeba (talk) 23:08, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 07:54, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 17:49, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge selectively to Discovery Institute. I don't think there's enough material on this organization for an article to stand on its own, but on the whole it's better that we keep track of who these people are. XOR'easter (talk) 18:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge selectively to Discovery Institute. Nothing in the existing article establishes notability (it seems to all be from the organization, general creationism, or mentions of things that the organization sponsored), and a search didn't turn up anything that would constitute extensive coverage independent of the subject. --tronvillain (talk) 18:20, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge selectively to Discovery Institute, leaving a redirect. Should some curious source checker come looking, it will be useful to have preserved some historical context. Just plain Bill (talk) 18:37, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.