Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phyisque Global

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:39, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Phyisque Global[edit]

Phyisque Global (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not satisfy WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Sourcing is very weak with reliability issues and reads like a promo piece in the present form. As an aside, the title of the article itself has been misspelled. MT TrainTalk 14:48, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 14:48, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 14:48, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 14:48, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Agree with the nominator's assessment that this doesn't meet the notability guidelines for companies. The press coverage is very light. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:46, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above and this look like created by someone from the same sock farm who were repeatedly creating Jag Chima (the CEO of this company) under various titles. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:55, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. The current article doesn't actually say why the subject is notable. Please expand it to explain that and it may have a chance of not being deleted. Accesscrawl (talk) 02:26, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:NCORP. FITINDIA 06:05, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.