Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phish Tickets By Mail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 17:38, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Phish Tickets By Mail[edit]

Not notable. Verging on fancruft. Any useful information can be merged into Phish tours. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 13:31, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Tenacious D Fan (talk) 13:32, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Phish tours. The material is a useful part of describing the Phish touring culture, but it would be better as a section there rather than being a standalone article. Wasted Time R (talk) 22:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan (talk) 00:31, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge; it's just plain silly to have an article dedicated to the mail ordering of tickets. It should at least be renamed to "Sale of Phish Tickets" and be expanded to cover all forms of ticket sale rather than just mail order. GO-PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 04:00, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - to Phish tours. Delete would be fine as an alternative, but this fails WP:N. LonelyBeacon (talk) 05:03, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't believe this content is even worth merging. I wouldn't cry if resulted in merge to Phish tours. No establishment of notability through stats or independent resources. -Verdatum (talk) 16:29, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge first paragraph and delete rest Brilliantine (talk) 17:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is complicated, see WP:MAD. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:51, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

merge to Phish tours. Lack of independent secondary sources. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:51, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.