Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philosophy, Cosmology, and Consciousness program

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:07, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophy, Cosmology, and Consciousness program[edit]

Philosophy, Cosmology, and Consciousness program (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Programs at institutions generally do not get Wikipedia articles. Any useful content can be reintegrated into California Institute of Integral Studies. jps (talk) 18:14, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:32, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:32, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:33, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as there's still nothing particularly convincing solid independent notability has been achieved yet, nothing convincing for its own article thus Delete. Notifying DGG for schools analysis. SwisterTwister talk 06:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. , essentially an advertisement for a non-notable program. In practice, individual programs within a department are almost always much too minute for separate articles. Not even the School of Consciousness and Transformation which offers this as one of its 10 programs would normally get an article of its own. DGG ( talk ) 13:06, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.