Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip J. Bartell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. So Why 15:05, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Phillip J. Bartell[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a film editor and writer, which just states that he exists and résumés his credits without actually demonstrating that he passes a notability criterion at all. As always, neither screenwriters nor film editors get an automatic inclusion freebie just for existing, but rather have to be reliably sourced as having achieved something that counts as a notability claim -- but the only reference present here at all is a blurb in his college alumni magazine which nominally verifies the fact that he worked on one film. This is not enough to get him an encyclopedia article in and of itself. Bearcat (talk) 20:31, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:34, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:34, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've begun adding secondary sources reviewing his work, but there are more here: http://www.metacritic.com/movie/eating-out-2-sloppy-seconds/critic-reviews Meets GNG, NARTIST. Innisfree987 (talk) 22:03, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - An interview and several peripheral references are not sufficient to demonstrate notability.--Rpclod (talk) 02:18, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

However, the editorial commentary preceding an interview does count as secondary source material toward notability; additionally, there are numerous independent reviews of films he wrote and/or directed. In addition to those cited in the entry and above, here are more: http://www.metacritic.com/movie/eating-out-all-you-can-eat Innisfree987 (talk) 05:11, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.