Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippines at 5th tier beauty pageants

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:54, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Philippines at 5th tier beauty pageants[edit]

Philippines at 5th tier beauty pageants (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsure of notability here. The pageants themselves seem to have not much in the way of sourcing to show notability, let alone such a specific hook on that area. Wizardman 16:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Martin451 23:20, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Martin451 23:20, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not notable. This is akin to having an article on a city counsil district election. Bearian (talk) 18:58, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero | My Talk 05:30, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I try to avoid the beauty pageant crap as much as possible after the whole Araksi Çetinyan nightmare, but I see no reason for this article to exist - as Bearian has said, it IS a non-notable stage in the progress. No reason for a standalone article. Mabalu (talk) 10:51, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.