Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippine Airlines Flight 443

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. No !votes for deletion aside from the nominator, and the comments below have sufficiently shown that this aviation incident is both covered in reliable sources, and passes our notability guidelines. (non-admin closure) Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 07:21, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Philippine Airlines Flight 443[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An entirely non-notable accident, fails WP:GNG, etc. etc Petebutt (talk) 05:24, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:19, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Hang on... you were the person who failed to delete Asiana Airlines Flight 162. This accident, with fifteen deaths, is notable.. Iloveplanes2003 (talk) 17:49, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - 15 deaths on a commercial flight is notable. Curious that the nom values WP:AIRCRASH which stipulates deaths must be involved for notability on AfDs on flights with not deaths (like with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JetBlue Airways Flight 292 (3rd nomination)), but omits that essay from the nom rationale from this afd when there actually were deaths. --Oakshade (talk) 01:45, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's in the list of the Philippines' worst commercial flight disasters.--RioHondo (talk) 03:43, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Keep - the aircraft was destroyed, all on board were killed. Third deadliest for the type involved. = no-brainer, we keep it. Mjroots (talk) 16:57, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, obviously notable, meets WP:GNG. - Ahunt (talk) 21:33, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I agree, 15 deaths on a commercial flight is notable. Article should be expanded, not deleted (and I'll see if I can improve it). Shelbystripes (talk) 21:31, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.