Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippe d'Albert, 11th duc de Luynes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:46, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Philippe d'Albert, 11th duc de Luynes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim to notability made, peers aren't inherently notable (especially those whose titles were officially abolished over 50 years before they were born). Wikipedia is not a genealogy website.

Also nominating two related articles:

Although WP:OTHERLANGS applies, it's still worth noting that no French Wikipedians have yet deemed any of the dukes notable enough to create an article on them. IgnorantArmies (talk) 13:36, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redrect all to Duke of Luynes. We don't need their genealogy and details of their family, but as the title still seems to be in use it's just about relevant to include the names of the title-holders. PamD 15:28, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:34, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:34, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and don't redirect. None of the three has any vestige of a reliable source, and – at least for the more recent ones, are probably WP:BLP violations. Not even those unreliable sources claim that these people are dukes – they call them by their names. Of course their forebears are notable, some of them considerably so; but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:10, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Justlettersandnumbers. The Drover's Wife (talk) 10:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree, perhaps they did something notable, but nothing in the article suggests these are notable individuals. Smmurphy^(Talk) 19:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doesn't meet WP:GNG. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 13:02, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- completely NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:19, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.