Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip V. Holberton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Philip V. Holberton[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Before search does not turn up significant coverage. Fails WP:NBIO Slywriter (talk) 20:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, it is also a little bit WP:PROMO Rlink2 (talk) 21:12, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely Promo issues, but not worth cleaning up unless it's staying in mainspace.Slywriter (talk) 21:32, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:18, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable businessman, we lack sources giving enough coverage. His academic positions do not rise to the level of being a notable academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:55, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable businessman fails WP:BIO.183.82.108.172 (talk) 22:30, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.