Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Henry (artist)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:07, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Philip Henry (artist)[edit]
- Philip Henry (artist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject of the article is not notable. Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 13:27, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 13:28, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. DoctorKubla (talk) 19:45, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Could work, but needs a major expansion. Be peaceful. Be a Dalai Lama. (talk) 01:20, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:19, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- Local artist, local coverage. Makes this user-submitted list. Probably talented enough to warrant an article, but unable to support with Reliable Sources required for BLP. Dru of Id (talk) 20:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:47, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Notability has not been sufficiently asserted - one reference is simply not enough for an article, at this stage. It would need a major revamp and or expansion - which can be done in a userspace, not live as an article. -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 09:44, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.