Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip H. Farber (second nomination)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep and enough with the procedural nominations already. --Tony Sidaway 04:11, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Philip H. Farber[edit]

This article was previously deleted at this AfD. A DRV consensus overturned this closure as improper, citing (among other things) a substantial rewrite near the end of the first AfD. Please consult the DRV before commenting here. This matter is resubmitted to AfD for new consideration. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 15:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy Keep - I voted for keep before per arguments of 999 and Geoffspear in the previous AfD. The article has seen significant expansion since then and is now fully cited. Plus I think that the confirmed use of sockpuppets by Mattisse, the nominator in the previous AfD, establishes that the original nom was made in bad faith. —Hanuman Das 15:17, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Notable enough for me. Paul August ☎ 15:24, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Week keep, borderline notability, good to see it-relisted. --Salix alba (talk) 17:35, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Absolutely. This listing has gotten far better than the original version that was questioned. I just added to it myself. Rosencomet 23:27, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, but not a speedy candidate. --badlydrawnjeff talk 15:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - glad to see this article back, I did a lot of work to bring it up to WP standards, only to see it deleted. -999 (Talk) 15:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep please author of new york time best seller and other contributions are very notable not borderline at all Yuckfoo 18:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep bestselling crackpot.  ALKIVAR™ 00:38, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Philip_H._Farber_(second_nomination)&oldid=1138227304"