Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip G. Bell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:43, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Philip G. Bell[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Self-published author who hasn't yet received sufficient attention in reliable, independent sources. Only 5 Ghits for his new book[1] No Google News (Archives) hits for him[2], and none of the Google Books seem to be about this Philip G. Bell either[3]. Fram (talk) 07:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:24, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Big Dom 16:33, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - Per nom. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 17:36, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete self-published author, not notable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:10, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.