Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Campose

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep He is notable per "Held a rank considered to be a flag, general or air officer, or their historical equivalents" from WP:MILPEOPLE.(non-admin closure) So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 13:04, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Philip Campose

Philip Campose (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are either not independent or are routine coverage. Per WP:MILPEOPLE, the Chief of Army Staff would be presumed notable, but not the Vice Chief of Army Staff. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:35, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

 Disagree All Vice Chiefs of US Army , and Many other country vice chiefs have pages . For Example

• Daniel B. Allyn
• John F. Campbell
• Eric K. Shinseki
• Ronald H. Griffith
  and many others have articles

KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 14:51, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 22:03, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 22:03, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 22:03, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

• Strong keep - this officer is a Lieutenant General, and usually most major generals upwards in combat arms are considered notable. He's also commanded a corps and Western Command (India). I fail to see why this officer has been nominated for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buckshot06 (talk • contribs)
• Keep - one of India's top generals who has served at the highest levels would seem to meet inclusion guidelines. General and Flag Rank officers typically demonstrate notability. EricSerge (talk) 01:15, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.