Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Friendly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:38, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Friendly[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional page; doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Has been tagged for notability for 9 years. Boleyn (talk) 17:44, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:27, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not appear to pass WP:ENT after searching. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 17:22, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 09:21, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No significant secondary sources whatsoever to help pass WP:GNG.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 04:48, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.