Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phi Alpha Kappa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete — Caknuck (talk) 23:26, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Phi Alpha Kappa[edit]

Does not appear to be especially notable, so I am nominating it for deletion. Lawrence Cohen 01:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although it has a history, there are no other hits on google aside from wikipedia and their personal site. --neonwhite user page talk 01:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - From what I am seeing, this is not a national organization, and given that it is local only, I think it more to assert any notability. LonelyBeacon (talk) 05:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable frat, no secondary coverage does not bode well for notability. Lankiveil (talk) 11:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Delete - fails WP:N. Macy's 123 review me 18:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The name here sounds very familiar for some reason, but I couldn't honestly tell you why. If you can't find sources for it, then delete, but it seems strange.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 04:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you thinking of Pi Kappa Alpha? far more notable? --neonwhite user page talk 05:33, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That'll be it.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 06:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.