Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phenomena Science

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted, patent nonsense that seemed to be just somebody farming hits for his Youtube video: On August 03, 2010, Florida-based singer/songwriter Tristan Clopet uploaded a YouTube video that is widely criticized for being illegitimate. However, after giving the video a closer examination, one could easily suggest the argument that without the presence of Tristan, there would be no variable to engage the Tulips to cause such an expedited process of Photosynthesis, thus no stimulant to cause the tulips' growth. Therefore, in studying Mill's Methods, one could logically conclude that Tristan's presence, if not his voice, acted as a concomitant variable that caused a physical, and chemical reaction in not only the Tulip, but the moisture, air pressure, and sunlight that was acting upon the tulip at that very moment. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:13, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Phenomena Science[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Complete nonsense. Possibly already deleted once (though I couldn't find a record), judging from the author's talk page. Chris (talk) 21:22, 16 August 2010 (UTC) Chris (talk) 21:22, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI – Logs say it was deleted on 11 August as a hoax ([1]). —KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:27, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per KuyaBriBri. Whose Your Guy (talk) 21:33, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete - No redeemable features. Should be speedied. scope_creep (talk) 22:50, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hopeless jibberjabber. Eddie.willers (talk) 22:24, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as patent nonsense per WP:CSD G1. Also unreferenced. -- Radagast 3 (talk) 02:03, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.