Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pharmacists for life international
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep. --Shreshth91 13:08, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Pharmacists for life international[edit]
Article is rather sparse and feels a bit like a promotional piece. Was tempted to speedy it under A3, but thought I'd send it to regular AfD for consideration in case anyone thinks it can be improved. --Alan Au 07:16, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- On the french wiki, this morning, someone used the speeedy way... BTW, if it is improved, it could stay. 82.224.88.52 08:37, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, valid stub. Kappa 11:41, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, legit organisation and the stub is valid enough. I cannot find the French vote - link?
- However, standards are very different. They enjoy consensus, for example, to delete practically all schools (as noted in one recent AfD, la plupart des lycées de France sont refusés alors pourquoi accepter les High School américaines?) Dottore So 13:26, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, valid stub of org in the news regularly. Hipocrite - «Talk» 14:22, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, as per above, even though they seem pretty insane based on the website - Bobet 14:45, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep if real Carina22 15:36, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, passes the Google test with flying colours. We can admire the French Wikipedia for having achieved a consensus on schools, but we'd be wrong to follow them on this occasion. — Haeleth Talk 17:23, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.