Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peuterey (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Randykitty (talk) 14:08, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peuterey (company)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created by an SPA/COI/UPE editor before ACPERM, so did not go through AfC and notability has not been adequately reviewed. I'm not at all convinced that it meets WP:NCORP, so listing here for discussion. The principal sources in the page – La Repubblica, Il Sole 24 ORE, La Nazione (this last pretty much a tabloid rag) – are almost all about Francesca Lusini, who I believe probably merits a Wikipedia page. What I don't see is in-depth coverage of the company itself, beyond routine reporting of routine business. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:14, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:37, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:37, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:37, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.