Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petra Ecclestone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 12:47, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Petra Ecclestone[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears not to pass WP:NOTABILITY for WP:BIO. Non-notable fashion designer is not made up for by being the daughter of a notable person, the later of which seems the only reason for inclusion Trident13 (talk) 22:56, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. —GregorB (talk) 01:05, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently she has her own successful label of menswear ("Form") that she sells through Harrods. How is that not notable? --Hegvald (talk) 01:32, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It did sell through Harrods - label was closed after 14months of operations. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 01:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Regardless of the reason for her fame or infamy, she has received continued coverage in major newspapers as evidenced by the sourcing present in the article. My own search shows that there is lots of coverage like this and this. -- Whpq (talk) 17:10, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:04, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - multiple reliable sources such as The Guardian and The Mail indicate she passes the general notability guideline. There are also lots of other possible sources online. Please read WP:BEFORE. I don't care if she's cynical or not, rich or poor, and a genius or talentless, but she is surely notable. Bearian (talk) 22:00, 8 February 2011 (UTC) P.S. I added information about her viral meningitis attack and charity work from The Times. Bearian (talk) 22:08, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.