Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petezza

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 01:46, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Petezza[edit]

Not surprisingly, I couldn't find any reliable sources on either of the given spellings of this "holiday" to verify the notability of this unsourced article, created by a single purpose account. neologism, things made up one day, either seems to apply. Challenged PROD, also by a SPA. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Delete - Article appears to be nonsense and something made up one day. The only possible source suggested by the text of the article is an unreliable forum. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 20:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFT, only sources are unreliable forums. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I prod'd this article because it looked like a hoax. Authors now claim that it is a real holiday, but it still appears to be something made up over a beer one day. In any case, it seems to be notable only on one message board about Maryland. —Travis ^talk 20:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per nom, as nonsense. Bearian (talk) 00:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFT, not that this really quite passes the nonsense test either. --Dhartung | Talk 00:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFT -- ¿Amar៛^{Talk to me/My edits} 08:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Some made-up holidays do have articles (one could argue Father's Day is "made up"), but they have reliable, secondary sources, and this doesn't. Besides, it is a borderline copyvio of [1]. This article violates WP:V, and WP:OR.--Phirazo 23:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.