Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peterborough Green-Up
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 02:23, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Peterborough Green-Up[edit]
- Peterborough Green-Up (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Borderline speedy but the article has been around for a while so I thought I'd list it here. Could only find superficial coverage and some local newspaper columns by the staff therefore I don't think the organization meets WP:ORG NeilN talk to me 08:00, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It appears to be largely self-promotion, its source is its own website, and its creator(s) exhibit WP:OWN and WP:COI behavior. Probably best to delete as being non-notable. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 08:41, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this organization. Joe Chill (talk) 14:33, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments[edit]
This AFD is a red-link within the article itself. Presumably something was omitted in the process. Maybe some AFD experts can help with that. Meanwhile, it might be worth pointing out that 70.51.91.85 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was trying to erase the page and this will aid in his effort, except he won't be able to rewrite it the way he presumably wants. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 15:15, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know why it's red as clicking on the link leads here. I used Twinkle to add the AFD notice as I've done many times before. --NeilN talk to me 17:01, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You're right.
It must be highlighted as part of the template.←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 17:05, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Purging the cache just now turned it blue for me. Dougweller (talk) 17:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Bingo. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 18:49, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Purging the cache just now turned it blue for me. Dougweller (talk) 17:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You're right.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:19, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - IP 70.51.91.85 seems to want the article gone, and given the lack of secondary sources, we should honor his wishes. Racepacket (talk) 03:19, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.