Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Pook

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. -- Scott Burley (talk) 22:20, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Pook[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find any coverage of this pseudonymous author, except listings of the books and the subject's own website. The article's only link is to the subject's website, and some of the text of the article has been copy / pasted from there. Tacyarg (talk) 20:42, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 20:43, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 20:45, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:33, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have added references - reviews of his books, and some quotes from them. I have deleted some of the content that was in the article - some copied from his website, and some contradicted by the sources, one of which gave his real name and occupation. I believe that he meets WP:AUTHOR - there are reviews by 6 different reviewers, 5 of them of good length, as well as some short ones by reviewers who clearly enjoyed them. RebeccaGreen (talk) 07:44, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Kudos to the indefatigable Rebecca Green for sourcing it.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:13, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw as nominator. Thank you, RebeccaGreen, for finding sources. Tacyarg (talk) 16:16, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.