Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Paul (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by the nominator. (non-admin closure) Mhhossein ^talk 11:35, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Paul (actor)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See also David Paul (actor), which has been nominated. Only sources are imdb and a freelance pop culture piece about the twins. No major appearances, includes minor role in major movie that was cut and movies that are not notable. Does not pass GNG or NACTOR ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 20:04, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:06, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:06, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:08, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Paul Twins (aka "The Barbarian Brothers") were popular for a time in 1980s and 1990s, although their articles are poorly sourced due their fame being pre-internet. They got a good deal of coverage in newspapers and in magazines such as Sports Illustrated and were the leads in The Barbarians, Think Big, Double Trouble and Twin Sitters, so would meet NACTOR as well as the GNG. Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,9,10. GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 03:42, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination - I should have been more thorough - unfortunately I did not perform a search under 'Barbarian brothers', and the name itself was too common to come up with relevant results. Thank you for your work on this. I would attempt to close this myself but that has resulted in a lot of major formatting errors in the past... thank you. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 15:28, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.