Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Nares

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:24, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Nares[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He sounds like an interesting and successful man, but I couldn't establish that he is notable separate from Social and Enterprise Development Innovations. It is probalby worth noting that these two articles were both started by the same WP:SPI and it reads as if written to promote.

After more than 11 years in CAT:NN, hopefully we can get this resolved. An WP:ATD is merge and redirtect, or just redirect, to Social and Enterprise Development Innovations. Boleyn (talk) 05:27, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 06:46, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 06:46, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:23, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or merge. I'm not convinced that the proposed merge target is notable either. Boleyn, what are your feelings about PRODDING Social and Enterprise Development Innovations? ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 09:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

user:Dom Kaos, when opening this, I looked at that target and came to the same conclusion, that it may well also be non-notable. Looking it over again, it is proddable. Boleyn (talk) 12:33, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non notable, badly written PR --Devokewater @ 20:27, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.