Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Musson

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per nomination withdrawl JForget 00:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Musson[edit]

Peter Musson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. Google News and Book searches bring up zero relevant pages. RadioFan (talk) 03:09, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: See www.mussonbassoonreeds.com.au/about-us/peter-musson/ for information on Peter Musson Heckel66 (talk) 13:03, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could you clarify your !vote, how does this person meet WP:BIO? The URL you mention (which is also referenced in the article) is a primary source and doesn't do much to demonstrate notability here.
  • Keep: This person is an important New Zealand/Australian musician. More information has been added to the article and some more reputable references.Rick570 (talk) 23:43, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I know that this is not a democracy. But why, in the "Adf" statistics, is only one Keep vote counted when there should be one other??Rick570 (talk) 04:42, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how AfD Statistics works, but my guess is that it's because there's no space between the first "Keep" and "See", so the AfD would interpret that as a "KeepSee" vote. I've added a space so that it's counted. Frickeg (talk) 05:23, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD isn't decided on number of "votes", so it really doesn't matter - it's read by a human admin who assesses the consensus when closing. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:29, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Its still not counted. very puzzling. As I said, democracy is not an issue. So why is it necessary to keep these statistics. Is'nt this page enough!Rick570 (talk) 10:08, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The discussion is still underway, the keep you mention will be considered by the closing admin along with all the other keeps and deletes (though it doesn't provide much insight on how that editor feels this person is notable, just a link to their business). This is not an automated process. For more information take a look at WP:NotEarly--RadioFan (talk) 17:54, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Principal Bassoonist with: NZBC Symphony Orchestra; Ulster Orchestra; Durban Symphony Orchestra; Niederrhein Sinfoniker;Queensland Symphony Orchestra and Guest Principal with Royal Philharmonic Orchestra;Gurzenich Orchestra; Australian Chamber Orchestra; Tasmanian Symphony Orchestra and Sydney Symphony Orchestra - is, in my view enough for notability in the field of Australian Bassoonists. There seem to me sufficient citations to support the information in the article which does not seem dubious or self serving. (Msrasnw (talk) 12:03, 12 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]
Withdrawn We've finally gotten through the primary sources and have good references to books and other sources which demonstrate the notability of this musician.--RadioFan (talk) 19:43, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Peter_Musson&oldid=1069823958"