Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Lee (martial artist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 01:48, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Lee (martial artist)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not demonstrated despite tagging since 2010. WP:PROD was removed by the subject himself. He is probably a great martial artist and a fun guy, but he doesn't meet the notability requirement in WP:BIO. The best independent source seems to be an article in the Lithgow Mercury which doesn't even get the name of his style right. For the Jedi connection there is a link to an ABC video which cannot be viewed outside Australia. – Fayenatic London 19:10, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:19, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see significant independent coverage or that he meets WP:MANOTE.Mdtemp (talk) 16:31, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree - a collection of non-notable associations (several show up only in this article) or passing contact (a visit to Russia). The subject clearly wants to be notable but well - isn't.Peter Rehse (talk) 10:29, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.