Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Jairus Frigate (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Riverworld. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 08:38, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Jairus Frigate[edit]

Peter Jairus Frigate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'd have just redirected it due to total failure at WP:GNG, but the prior AfD had a comment by User:DGG, whom I respect a lot, and if he thinks this is a notable character, well, 10 years later I'd love to hear yours (and anyone else's who wanders to this discussion) thoughts on this. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:57, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge and redirect to Riverworld. I don't see a lot of analysis of this character. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:14, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep very notable series, a notable character as the authorial voice, and an indication of sources talking about it, tho not cited. They should be found.--there's a lot of literature about the author, and some of it probably discusses this. However, I admit I do not have the time to do this myself. DGG ( talk ) 18:39, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • I looked at sources, but I can't see any extensive analysis. A few sources do note he is his alter-ego, yes, but if there is any discussion-in-depth, as much as a single para on this, I haven't found it yet. I would be fine with merge and redirect, but I just don't see enough (either content or notability) for a stand-alone article. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:47, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) 22:30, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to the series article; not notable independently from it.  Sandstein  05:22, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.