Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Griffiths (statistician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:04, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Griffiths (statistician)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence this person meets any notability criteria. Can't find any coverage in RS or otherwise. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:53, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep searching with "Peter Griffiths" statistician gives more results such as this here , also he founded a very popular website so sources should exist offline and online. Haven't had time for a full search yet. Atlantic306 (talk) 14:07, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:24, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:24, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. A search finds no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. His statistician award from a minor organization is non-notable -- the organization's own magazine (Issue 147, pg5) itself makes only a few passing comments about it. I would suggest a redirect to CricketArchive might be appropriate but that page was deleted by AFD in December. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.