Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Griffith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Griffith[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of many "Occupation: Relative" Wiki entries that got created back in the day—even his granddaughter Stella had a page at one point—but somehow it got overlooked when these sort of trivialities were being purged by the numbers. Subject was never covered in the mass media and had no public career to speak of. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yours6700 (talk • contribs) 20:34, March 14, 2024 (UTC)

I reformatted the nomination because it wasn't formatted correctly. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:08, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Businesspeople, Advertising, and United States of America. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: WP:INHERIT could be of use here to evaluate sourcing. TLA^tlak 04:49, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see no problem with deleting this article. If Stella's got deleted then his probably should get deleted too. 2603:6080:5D00:2562:32FC:EBFF:FE13:87D8 (talk) 23:12, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of reliable sources. A random family search website, IMdB, and a People interview do not constitute WP:SIGCOV. Bearian (talk) 16:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.